Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2005 20:06:31 GMT -6
I've come to the final decision of a Soloist, but I've never played a SL1. I've heard that they are better than the SL2H. Can anybody give me any imput on this? Because maybe I could try one out. Thanks ;D
|
|
reid
Full Member
gyar
Posts: 214
|
Post by reid on May 5, 2005 22:26:34 GMT -6
I've played both... I prefer the SL1, but the only difference between the SL1 and SL2H is the pickup setup... SL1 = S S H , SL2H = H H s=single coil pickup h=humbucker , order going from neck to bridge. Whichever you prefer of the two, I personally like the SSH 'range' better, I guess.  Hope that helps. |
|
|
|
Post by Neoclasiccl on May 6, 2005 20:39:11 GMT -6
depends on your pickup preference. I like both but ended up with the SL1
|
|
|
|
Post by Armitage on Jun 28, 2005 7:37:52 GMT -6
Something to consider. My newest Soloist came with 250k tone pots instead of the usual 500k, it was really dull until I changed it. I don't know why they're doing that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Neoclasiccl on Jun 28, 2005 11:22:09 GMT -6
they both are great guitars but I liked the single coil at the neck better so I got the SL1  |
|
Nads
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by Nads on Jul 1, 2005 12:53:04 GMT -6
Personally I'd be tempted to go SL2 and install a coil splitter:D
|
|
